Updated: 03-01-2026 at 3:30 PM
1k


Gratuity is a significant financial benefit given to employees as a token of appreciation for their long-term service, but it is more than just a benefit; it is a right of all employees working in a company or an organisation. The government of India has created a special law for this, named the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, which safeguards this basic right of employees working in the country. However, questions often arise about whether gratuity can be withheld or forfeited if an employee has committed an offence, faced disciplinary actions, or has not vacated employer-provided housing.
According to Indian law, specifically the Forfeiture of Gratuity Section 4(6), the conditions under which gratuity can be forfeited are very strict and clearly mentioned, along with a clear difference between the permissible forfeiture and denial.
Read the article to learn in detail about the Payment of Gratuity Act, forfeiture of gratuity meaning, legal boundaries, employee rights, and key gratuity forfeiture cases in India that clarify this issue.
The table below summarises some key information about the Gratuity Act that one should know.
| Name of the act | Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 |
|---|---|
| Why was it created? | To govern how employers pay gratuities to their workers in India |
| Basic rule | Gratuity is a right that every employee deserves |
| What does the forfeiture of gratuity meaning? | Withholding an employee’s gratuity at the time of payment |
| Legal ground for forfeiture of gratuity | Willful damage to the employer’s property, disorderly conduct, acts of moral turpitude, etc. |
| How to calculate gratuity? | Gratuity calculator |
Read More: How To Track Your EPF Claim Progress Easily?
The Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, governs how employers pay gratuities to their workers in India. However, the forfeiture of gratuity is based on the Forfeiture of Gratuity Section 4(6), which indicates clearly under which terms a gratuity can be lost by an individual employee.
Willful omission or negligence leading to loss suffered by the employer’s property.
Riotous behaviour, disorderly conduct, or any other violent acts demonstrated by an employee.
Any form of moral turpitude in Gratuity Act committed during employment.
However, this banishment only applies when an employee has been dismissed from service on those grounds. It should be noted that even if the worker is involved in some disciplinary actions or criminal proceedings, then he/she cannot be denied his/her entitlements unless sec. 4(6) conditions are met.
Several rulings of Supreme Court judgement on forfeiture of gratuity have established that gratuity can only be withheld in cases of proven and serious misconduct. This ensures that employers cannot easily deny this benefit without substantial legal grounds.
For instance, it was held by the court in Texmaco Limited v Shri Ram Dhan (1993), that withholding the gratuity amount from an employee retiring from service without proven misconduct constitutes unfair labour practice. This highlights the need for concrete evidence before denying gratuity benefits.
One of the gratuity forfeiture cases in India is of Brundaban Sahu v. a.s. R.T. Corporation Ltd. (1993), wherein the court held that compulsorily retired employees are still entitled to their gratuity unless there is specific misconduct. The court reinforced that ongoing disciplinary proceedings do not automatically lead to forfeiture of gratuity.
In Gopalkrishna v. Karnataka Soaps & Detergents Ltd. (1996), it was emphasised that even where disciplinary proceedings have been initiated against an employee, his/her employer cannot deny him/her gratuity. The judiciary consistently protects the right to gratuity unless dismissal is based on reasons outlined in the Act.
The point from these Supreme Court judgement on withholding of gratuity and pension is that unless fired under reasons expressly stated in the Payment of Gratuity Act, an employee remains eligible to receive gratuity.
Read More: West Bengal Health Scheme- A Magic Wand for State Employees & Pensioners
Doubt exists as to whether or not an employee could be denied his/her long-service benefits due to involvement in criminal cases or failure to vacate company premises occupied by him/her. Court decisions have elaborated on this aspect, too.
Nonetheless, in Travancore Plywood Ind. Ltd. v. Regional Joint Labour Commissioner (1996), it was decided by the court that non-receipt of the employer's land cannot be used as grounds for retaining the gratuity.
Also, Lt.Col. A.V. Tiwari (Retd.) v The Secretary Ministry of Welfare, Government of India (1996) declared that even if employees refuse to leave accommodation provided by employers, they should be given their retrenchment benefits, including gratuities.
Further on in Rajendra Kumar Nangia v Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd.(2002), it was also said that the mere pendency of a criminal case will not preclude an employee from receiving his/her dues under the govt scheme. This protection ensures that ongoing legal proceedings do not impede employees from enjoying their normal accretions as a result of the unfair denial of such benefits.
The Act and various judgments provide for the fact that only under certain conditions may a worker’s right to receive gratuity be forfeited by the employers. These are
Misconduct, as defined under section 4(6), leads to the dismissal of an employee.
Willful omission, negligence, or riotous conduct demonstrated by the employer.
Before any confiscation is done, the employee is given fair notice and an opportunity to be heard in his or her defence.
The courts in India have taken a similar view. In Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd. v. Pramodini Rohidas Sutar (2009), it was held that a forfeiture of gratuity on grounds of moral turpitude should only be valid if the employee has been convicted of the offence.
Also, in Vijaya Bank v. Sri Mohan Das Ramana Shetty (2009), emphasis was laid that gratuity could not be forfeited unless the respondent had been afforded a hearing.
Read More: EPFO 3.0- Transformative Updates Await PF Members In 2025
There is a statutory requirement that employees must receive gratuity after working for no less than five years. The employer is required by law to pay this amount except under certain specified circumstances where there can be a forfeiture of it. Any retention or reduction regarding gratuity payment without following due process provisions amounts to unfairness, which can always be contested before the court.
Employees, whose gratuities have been unduly held back, can seek redress from courts of law. On many occasions, the courts have said that gratuity cannot be withheld arbitrarily as it is considered one of the retirement benefits.
The forfeiture of gratuity is purely governed by the Forfeiture of Gratuity under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, with clear-cut reasons for non-payment and the payment of gratuity comes under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. This law is a reminder to all employers working in India to strictly adhere to legal requirements before withholding or forfeiting an employee’s beneficial retirement entitlements. And for employees, this law is a protective shield that guards one of their basic rights and helps them in challenging the unlawful withholding of gratuities.
Both employers and employees should know these laws so that employers can strictly adhere to them and the employees can ensure that their rights are not violated or infringed upon. At the end, gratuity is a recognition provided to all the employees by their employers as a token of their long service, and therefore, this symbol must be protected when tarnished.
Stay updated with Jaagruk Bharat to get the latest information on government healthcare schemes and more, and reach out to us via our community page if you have any questions.
Frequently Asked Questions
0
0
1k
0
0
1k Views
0
No comments available





Our Company
Home
About
T&C
Privacy Policy
Eula
Disclaimer Policy
Code of Ethics
Contact Us
Cancellation & Refund Policy
Categories
Women
Insurance
Finance
Tax
Travel
Transport & Infrastructure
Food
Entertainment
Communication
Government ID Cards
E-commerce
Traffic guidelines
Miscellaneous
Housing and Sanitation
Sports
Startup
Environment and Safety
Education
Agriculture
Social cause
Employment
Disclaimer: Jaagruk Bharat is a private organization offering support for documentation and government scheme access. We are not affiliated with any government body. Official services are available on respective government portals. Our goal is to make processes easier and more accessible for citizens.
All Copyrights are reserved by Jaagruk Bharat